{"id":6125,"date":"2024-03-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2024-03-04T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/p4.rvinfo.com.br\/blog\/igualdade-salarial-lei-tem-falhas-e-pode-afetar-reputacao\/"},"modified":"2025-10-30T22:01:21","modified_gmt":"2025-10-30T22:01:21","slug":"igualdade-salarial-lei-tem-falhas-e-pode-afetar-reputacao","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/insights\/igualdade-salarial-lei-tem-falhas-e-pode-afetar-reputacao\/","title":{"rendered":"Equal pay: law has flaws and could affect reputation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Companies are considering going to court to avoid having to forward data<br \/>\nthat will feed the federal government systems as required by the Equality Act<br \/>\nSalary, according to lawyers interviewed by Folha.<\/p>\n<p>The deadline for submitting the salary transparency and remuneration criteria report<br \/>\nwas extended until next Friday (8), but the companies understand that the base<br \/>\nof data used in preparing the required reports is fragile, which can create a<br \/>\nimpression that the company does not adopt measures to promote gender equality.<br \/>\nThe effect, in the end, would be to compromise their public image. According to the law,<br \/>\ncompanies with more than one hundred employees must provide information about their<br \/>\nframeworks for monitoring gender pay inequality.<br \/>\nThe database considered for the report is the CBO (Brazilian Classification of<br \/>\nOccupations). In the opinion of lawyer Caio Taniguchi, partner in the area of \u200b\u200bLaw<br \/>\nLabor and Social Security of the TozziniFreire office, it is limited by not showing<br \/>\npossible reasons for salary differences in the same position, such as time of service<br \/>\ncompany, employee specializations, commitment, etc.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDespite the criticisms presented about the mechanisms that will be used to<br \/>\nto investigate the remuneration received by men and women, there is no discussion of<br \/>\nimportance that a law of this magnitude has nowadays\u201d, Gabriela Carvalho,<br \/>\nlabor coordinator at PSG Advogados.<\/p>\n<p>The biggest concern is what they consider to be a lack of clarity about what will be<br \/>\nconsidered by the Ministry of Labor and Employment, responsible for supervising the<br \/>\ncompanies within the scope of the law and apply fines. Those who do not send the data to the<br \/>\nreport will pay an administrative fine of up to 3% on the payroll, with a limit<br \/>\nfixed at one hundred minimum wages.<\/p>\n<p>Taniguchi draws attention to the fact that the preparation of the report will be the responsibility of<br \/>\nMinistry of Labor and Employment, and not to companies. This is another point of<br \/>\ninsecurity for entrepreneurs.<br \/>\nLabor lawyer F\u00e1bia Bertanha, from the Lopes Muniz law firm, also points out that the<br \/>\ndata also do not consider points negotiated in collective agreements or standards<br \/>\ninternal that may generate salary differences and that would not be discriminatory<br \/>\nIn addition to the lack of detail, Manuela Cristina Fernandes Leite, labor lawyer<br \/>\nwho coordinates Chiode Minicucci Advogados, highlights that the CBO groups the positions into<br \/>\nlarge groups. \u201cThis means a huge variety of positions that often have<br \/>\nremunerations that are quite different from each other will be grouped within the same<br \/>\n&#039;universe&#039;\u201d, ponders Leite.<\/p>\n<p>The classification of occupations, according to Taniguchi, from TozziniFreire, was never used to<br \/>\ninspection purposes, only for statistical purposes. Therefore, there is no<br \/>\ndetailing in this system how existing job structures work.<br \/>\nTogether with the Ministries of Labor and Employment and Women, lawyers who<br \/>\nserve companies made little progress in trying to answer questions. After a<br \/>\nonline transmission made by the departments to deal with the matter, the perception was more<br \/>\nproblems.<\/p>\n<p>One of them, according to Manuela Leite, is the decision of the ministries to use information<br \/>\nrelating to the \u201cmedian contractual salary\u201d, the \u201cmedian admission salary\u201d and the \u201csalary<br \/>\naverage actually paid\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNone of these definitions are in the legislation. The mathematical question, between averages and<br \/>\nmedians, is already quite complex \u2014as they are not easy numbers to find for a<br \/>\ncompany,\u201d says the lawyer.<\/p>\n<p>The Ministry of Labor and Employment was contacted by the report, but has not yet<br \/>\nhe responded.<\/p>\n<p>Companies also fear the effects of disclosing salary and job data,<br \/>\nboth for competitiveness between companies, and also because it will allow them<br \/>\nemployees compare their salaries based on objective criteria. That&#039;s right<br \/>\nafter the Ministry of Women ensured that the law does not violate the LGPD (General Law for the Protection of<br \/>\nData).<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn my opinion, the publication of this data will increase the judicialization of requests<br \/>\nof equality and equal pay,\u201d says lawyer Gabriela Carvalho, coordinator<br \/>\nlabor law at PSG Advogados.<\/p>\n<p>When the employee is unique in his\/her role, there is still the risk of easy identification,<br \/>\neven if your name is preserved.<\/p>\n<p>Market Sheet<\/p>\n<p>Receive the most important news about the economy in your email; open to not<br \/>\nsubscribers.<\/p>\n<p>Salary adjustments based on productivity and meritocracy would also be at risk. As the<br \/>\nreport will be widely publicized, companies could avoid these promotions<br \/>\nso that they are not later seen as discriminatory.<\/p>\n<p>For lawyer \u00c9rika Seddon, partner in the firm&#039;s Labor and Union practice<br \/>\nMattos Filho, companies&#039; concern about reputational damage is legitimate. In<br \/>\nher assessment, the report may expose a degree of gender inequality that<br \/>\nit really exists, but it appears to be worse than it actually is.<\/p>\n<p>Legislation addressing pay equity also requires companies to report<br \/>\nits policies to promote equality. According to Caio Taniguchi, from TozziniFreire, the<br \/>\navailable form has only topics that hinder the release of<br \/>\ninformation.<\/p>\n<p>Lawyers say that although gender inequality exists in companies, there is<br \/>\nan effort to adopt practices that reduce disparity.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s no point in just chasing companies to adapt their practices<br \/>\nwages, while the regulation of paternity leave is still at a standstill<br \/>\nNational Congress, for example,\u201d says lawyer Manuela Cristina Fernandes Leite.<br \/>\nThe expectation of lawyers who serve companies is that the start of the validity of the<br \/>\nlaw serves more as an educational tool rather than a punitive one.<\/p>\n<p>To Folha, the Minister of Women, Cida Gon\u00e7alvez, said that she does not intend to fine<br \/>\ncompanies immediately. According to her, the government wants to see the law complied with at least<br \/>\nwith equal pay at the base, that is, in starting salaries in companies.<\/p>\n<p><em>Article originally published on February 29, 2024 in Folha de S. Paulo.<\/em><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Empresas est\u00e3o considerando entrar na Justi\u00e7a para n\u00e3o ter que encaminhar os dados que alimentar\u00e3o os sistemas do governo federal conforme exige a Lei da Igualdade Salarial, segundo advogados ouvidos pela Folha. O prazo para entregar o relat\u00f3rio de transpar\u00eancia salarial e de crit\u00e9rios remunerat\u00f3rios foi prorrogado para a pr\u00f3xima sexta-feira (8), mas as companhias [&hellip;]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6117,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[116],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6125","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-na-midia"],"acf":[],"featured_image_src":{"landsacpe":["https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/add10fdef36463b7b0d83bba0fe6ee50-600x445.jpg",600,445,true],"list":["https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/add10fdef36463b7b0d83bba0fe6ee50-463x348.jpg",463,348,true],"medium":["https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/add10fdef36463b7b0d83bba0fe6ee50-300x300.jpg",300,300,true],"full":["https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/07\/add10fdef36463b7b0d83bba0fe6ee50.jpg",600,600,false]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6125","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6125"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6125\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6220,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6125\/revisions\/6220"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6117"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6125"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6125"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chiode.com.br\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6125"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}